Category Archives: PARCC Testing

The Significance of school testing headphones with the New Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

In Dec 2015, Chief Executive Obama finalized the new, bipartisan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which is expected to change the scenery and atmosphere of education since the No Child Left Behind Act. Here is an explanation of when, where, and why school testing headphones will become a significant component of a school’s gadgets list with the new standards.
Technology Increasing Together with Education
As we have resolved earlier in our post on top education styles in 2017, technological innovation will carry on growing in importance and usefulness in the classroom. The new ESSA will not only indicate that growth but also motivates it. The marketplace itself facilitates the use of technological innovation in the classroom, not only as an assistive tool for students but in to stay “future ready” for changes and requirement of technological innovation. The invoice, therefore, shows a guarantee to spend more funds on technological innovation as academic resources, and plus the use of computer systems and cellular phones, school testing headphones too will develop in importance as well.
Increased Accessibility to Pre-Kindergarten Classes
The ESSA also is designed to improve access pre-kindergarten for all students, which will help quickly boost the academic, social, psychological, and physical development of youngsters. With it come resources that are necessary for pre-school older kids, who are also suffering from a beginning access technological innovation at both house and college events. Children in pre-school might use iPads for academic activities and events, and headphones like the Hamilton Bend Phones–which develop with kids and secure hearing with a weak disturbance threshold–will become useful for these kids to be successful at a beginning age.

Growing Significance of Songs and the Arts

The new invoice also details assistance for music and the artistry, in addition to STEM topics. This aid in the art can lead to a need for educational institutions to have top quality headphones for music sessions and laboratories, where only headphones will be required in purchase for students to complete projects or take examinations. For these situations, we suggest noise-canceling headphones with quantity management, which can help students pay attention to their work or evaluation components either of the sessions, at home or in school, without diversion. Because many music assessments include hearing carefully and determining specific notices, appears to be, equipment, machines, and more having top quality school testing headphones will help students listen to the sound with quality and differentiate variations. Educational headphones are also appropriate outside music sessions and will be required in arts-focused topics such as movie, literature, interaction and production, and more.

Rigorous Classroom Standards
One of the most basic changes that will affect the classroom atmosphere includes enhanced specifications for the program to become educationally extensive for all students. Wanting to close the gap between classes in private and rental educational institutions and indicate their rigor in public schools the new law will help all students prepare for universities and professions under more complicated specifications.
With that come new methods to show and increase the program that will include the students’ attention in different ways. From hearing about audio books to getting referrals, watching movies, and more, audio/sound gadgets will become essential resources to help students succeed. Many educational institutions and regions with extended sessions have their students and staff using technological innovation for many projects and depend on top quality gadgets to show and evaluation components for their program specifications, as well as Advanced Positioning examinations and Worldwide Baccalaureate sessions.
Overall, a lot of planning will be required for a university or region to meet the changes in the ESSA. We estimate that a need for top quality sound and visible high quality will be necessary for students to learn and be successful eventually.
Are any particular headphones safe for kids?

Professionals also suggest that the period spent listening to headphones should be limited to two hours a day (for kids and parents), even if the volume level is defined at 85dB. Limiting the volume level on earphones you give to your children is a wise decision if you want to help protect their hearing, but some professionals warn against children using any types of headphones. While the World Health Organization (WHO) and EUROPEAN UNION state that 85dB is a good safety limit, the USA Environmental Protection Agency and USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest 70dB as the usual daily noises exposure level. That 85dB level is extracted from functional studies of noise exposure and hearing loss for parents, not kids.

The problems are that 70dB is very silent and will likely not drown out ambient sound, so 85dB becomes the norm despite it being extremely damaging to an immature person’s hearing.
There are other factors why even 85dB is unsafe for kids, especially when using earphones or earbuds. Children’s ears are very sensitive to noise damage, possibly due to growing and development of nerve fibers and other cells. Also because of their smaller sized external auditory canals, the eardrum is much closer to the sound source.

Incidental challenges with screenings
Depending on your state health care or education department, the ability to hear tests are usually administered to students in quality grades K, 1, 3, 5, 9 and sometimes grade 7.

A school & college health professional nurse, speech-language pathologist or a checking out audiologist usually does school screenings. However, the sanitary screening conditions are not always ideal. For example, tests in some cases take place in a gymnasium. Depends on where children take the tests, poor sound, reverberation and ambient noise can impact results.

Secondly, the children may have an ear infection or cold or the upper respiratory tract infection that daytime, which can impact hearing, the fit of the over-the-ears headphones or the attention span of the child also sometimes affect the screenings.

Things you should know about the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for Colleges and Careers (PARCC)

What is PARCC?

PARCC or the partnership for assessment of readiness for college and careers is a group of states partnered together to develop a set of common students’ assessments. Developing the PARCC is handled by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The assessments by PARCC measure the knowledge and skills that give students confidence and success in the main academic areas. Such skills include evidence-based writing, mathematical problem solving, and understanding complex texts.

Who should take PARCC assessments?

As such, students between grades 3 to 8, inclusive, are given the opportunity to take online PARCC assessments in mathematics and ELA, each spring. PARCC results are used together with other measures to create a broader picture of a child’s progress. The other measures include report card grades, teacher feedback, and classroom performance. So, with PARCC you can be sure that a child’s development isn’t just based on their scores in school but on a statewide standard that compares the performance of children from different schools.

How are PARCC tests designed?

PARCC assessments are intended to assess the member states’ Common Core State Standards. On the PARCC website, are ELA test specification documents that should help you better understand the design of ELA assessments. Also available to the public are mathematics test specification documents that provide test blueprints and claims structures that outline the goals and format of the assessment. They also give evidence statements that link the content of the assessment to Common Core State Standards.

How are PARCC assessments taken?

PARCC assessments are computerized and are completed online. For this reason, some of the questions are multiple choice. However, others may ask the students to plot a point on a graph, shade an area or slot in their answer to an equation. For language tests, students might be required to read short passages and write short essays.

Are PARCC tests harder than other standardized tests?

These assessments are designed to be more rigorous than the tests offered in each of the member states. Setting high standards is important because they align to the CCSS which put emphasis on reading, comprehension, and critical thinking.

What are the cons of PARCC assessments?

Well, many complaints have come from younger students, the cause of disagreement since the test format and questions are too confusing to them. Again, there are those who have an issue with the time it takes to sit and prepare for the tests. They tend to think that this time could have been put to better use. However, there is also the question of the resources used by schools to upgrade technology in readiness for the tests. Those who belong to this school of thought say the resources used are unnecessarily too much.

Some have also expressed fears that teachers will end up teaching for the tests and nothing else. Others say that there are too much emphasis formal texts in ELA as opposed to creative writing and literature. As another form of standardized test, PARCC may not truly reveal the student’s knowledge, skills, and understanding. As much as PARCC assessments include test items across different levels of cognitive ability, there is no provision for the assessment of students with special needs, leaving out a key element of any assessment system. The requirement that students use technology may disadvantage many students from poor and low-income areas who do not have as much experience using computers.

What are the benefits of PARCC assessments?

The proponents of PARCC assessments believe that with more rigorous tests, students will be better prepared for colleges and careers. They are based on the CCSS standards that require students to show problem-solving skills. As such, the tests are designed to ensure students know how to solve problems rather than simply memorizing the correct answers. A comparison can also be drawn between students’ progress in the states, which administer PARCC tests, thus creating a common standard of assessment between different states.

Some of the proponents of these tests have also observed that PARCC tests make teachers more accountable. Holding the teachers in charge of tests provide a means of gauging and improving performance in the entire class. Since the tests have been created in collaboration with over 800 colleges, they ensure that students who graduate from high school are ready for college. Parents and teachers may also use PARCC assessments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the students and any additional instruction required.

PARCC assessments are also so flexible that schools in their administration need not much time and resources. As others take the tests, teachers and students who are not taking them can be in class doing meaningful learning. The supporters of these tests also say that it is easy to tie performance in PARCC tests to the money spent by various states on education.

The technology hurdles of PARCC in schools

PARCC is actually a short form of Partnership for assessment of readiness for college and career. Basically PARCC is a consortium of 8 different states. The district of Colombia and bureau of Indian Education are also part of it and they are working to create and place a standard of k-12 assessment in English language and Mathematics. This consortium was also awarded with the top assessment funds in 2010. The US education department awarded these funds to help in the development of the k-12 assessment. PARCC has included many educators and more than 200 educators and administrators are involved in the development of the k-12 assessment. In 2015, this consortium on the feedback of different schools and educators has reevaluated the assessment program. There are many technology problems that PARCC is facing these days. Actually the most of the assessments of the PARCC are computer based and that is why many problems are being faced by the students giving these computer based assessments.

Technology Setup:

Most of the tests and the assessments of PARCC are based online. So for the computer test all the technology and the system should be in working condition. All the students and the institutes should know the basic use of computer and the specific software used for the tests. While students are studying and preparing for the assessments then the administration are looking for the basic tools and the information to prepare the technology. PAARC has announced that every institute should confirm technical readiness for their state school or institute.

Technology Problems and guidelines by PARCC:

There are many technology related guidelines that are given by the PARCC regarding computer hardware, input devices and security requirements etc. all the schools and the institutes look for and implement these basic technology guidelines to check the eligibility of the existing computers and other devices that are used for test taking. All the guidelines related to the technology are being updated with the release of new testNave. The new version of the testNave is going to be released in the first month of the next year. In 2014, PARCC capacity planning tool was updated. This tool was actually designed to assist school and district leaders to check for any gaps in the assessment system. That includes computer test taking and all other devices that are used for the test taking purposes. That was actually designed to check the flaws and to fill them.

TestNav expected behaviors:

Actually there are many issues reported in the testNav use, so a document was released which was for the district and the school coordinator to check and solve any issue is the testNav. There might be many problems like not displaying the particular items that are designed. This document is very useful because most of the answers by the students can be answered easily after reading this document.

Effects of IOS 9.3 release:

Apple has officially released its new software IOS 9.3 for the users. This release affects the ipads that are being used for the assessments of PARCC. Actually the IOS 9.3 is not compatible with the testNav and that is why it is not working. All the users were strictly advised that they must not update their pads before the launch of new windows.

Java critical patch update:

Oracle has released a java update and this update will affect the windows and the operating system like Internet Explorer, Firefox and Safari. This new java update was recommended but it was not recommended to the small schools and districts who work on the auto update setup. There might be many problems depending upon the error that is being shown on the screen. There are various problems like username and password in correction, error of unable to connect and the start button might turn grey after the login.


As there are various problems and mistakes reported by the various institutions regarding the assessment test so PARCC has set a trial for the schools and the districts to identify the problems and the issues that they are facing while using testNav. For this purpose the sample data was used instead of the full assessment data. Once all the procedure was done and all the teachers and relevant staff had learned how to configure it the trial ends. The trials were of almost 60 minute each. Many of the trials were lasted for a great time like even two- three days depending upon the infra-structure. But this thing had really helped in overcoming many technology issues that were faced by many schools and districts.


Here are some of the most basic PARCC technology issues that are being faced by most of the schools and districts.

  1. Java issues: As the testNav is dependent on Java to run on macs etc. there were many issues related to Java.
  2. Resuming issues: the test resuming issue is also one of the most basic issues.
  3. ID/password issues: Id/password issues were also common in case if student enter wrong information.
  4. Text to speech issues: there were many issues regarding text to speech and human reader.
  5. Cache issues: The proctor cache file must be downloaded in order to start the test. The test gets freeze if this is not done. There are many issues regarding this.


Over all we can conclude that PARCC (Partnership for assessment of readiness for college and career) is actually a consortium of eight different states. There are many assessments and tests that are done on the computers and Macs etc. As the technology is involved in these processes so there are many technology problems that are faced by many schools and districts PARCC. PARCC is trying to overcome these problems and to make the technology system a problem free one.

Oklahoma’s Repeal of Common Core

Though initially on board with adopting the Common Core, things came to a screeching halt when the state decided to drop them as a way to maintain state control of educational standards. Interestingly enough, Oklahoma is notorious for having some of the lowest educational achievements in the entire country. Nevertheless, it was a move that made dissenters pleased but teachers upset.


Tests First

Unsurprisingly, Oklahoma first pulled out of the standardized test that was to be associated with the Core, PARCC. This, however, was hardly a detrimental move as many states are opting out of this test altogether. Following a survey, it was found that only one in five of Oklahoma’s 1,773 schools would have enough technology to even administer the test, not to mention the sheer impossibility of funding an overhaul to get every school the technology to do so. In addition, their state test only took two to three hours while PARCC would have upped that number to nine. It was a decision in 2013 that was not driven by anti-Core individuals so much as the reality of Oklahoma’s situation.


Core Second

Interestingly enough, however, it seemed that Oklahoma, a state that appeared to be for the Core, eventually dropped it in 2014. What made this so shocking was the fact that Governor Mary Fallin had been loudly proclaiming the Core’s benefits since 2011. She even loudly defended them at the National Governors Association in early 2014. One day after this, Oklahoma introduced a bill to repeal the Core. It practically zoomed its way through the state government and ended up on Fallin’s desk. However, in a move that would shock many, Fallin approved the bill.

This proved to be a hard hit for the state’s teachers that had been preparing for Core implementation for three whole years. Many didn’t even know of the change as the Core was dropped in June, months before they would return to teach. For a lot of teachers, this was a rough blow for their students. As it turns out, there are quite a few schools in the state where many students that start the year will have moved to a different school by the end. Teachers saw the Core as a way to help those students that were always on the move across the country by regulating what was learned, when.

However, even though the Core is gone, its spirit still remains. No matter what Oklahoma is using, most teachers have adopted and adapted numerous ways the Core taught them to reassess teaching children. Now firm believers in the benefit of teaching in a way that promotes students to make discoveries on their own, classrooms are faring a bit better. While the government continues to argue about where the state’s education is headed, the teachers are doing all they can to make sure their students are prepared for anything.

Arkansas Dismantles the Core

Arkansas has been one of the oldest adopters of Common Core, bringing it into the state July 12, 2010. Taking this involvement a step further, they are also one of the governing members of PARCC, or Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for Colleges and Careers, a collection of states that works to write yearly assessments based on the Core standards. While there has been a growing amount of recent controversy, this southern state has performed the most peaceful coup as they work to find standards that fit their own state.


Initial Controversy

Starting in 2010, the state has been slowly transforming its standards to those aligned with the Common Core, having now fully implemented all changes. However, not all individuals were happy about this toward the final stages of implementation. In 2014, legislation was filed trying to block funding for the Core. This failed to get very far.

Then, during Asa Hutchinson’s run for governor in 2014, he stated that, if elected, he would found a task force faced with the responsibility to study they Core’s standards and make recommendations based on what they found. He was indeed elected and, in early 2015, founded a team comprised of 16 people. It actually proved to be a successful venture.

Following this, a bill was proposed in 2015 that would remove Arkansas from PARCC. This failed and the state ran its first statewide PARCC exam that same year. Yet this bill didn’t remain quiet. Instead of giving up completely, it was toned down, merely asking that the committee’s decisions be considered going forward. Interestingly enough, the committee called for the state to not administer PARCC tests but ACT tests instead.


Slow Dismantling

As it stands, Arkansas is now fully set on going after the ACT assessments, citing the four hour test as being much better for college preparation determination than the eight hour PARCC. In addition, the committee found that the ACT is also aligned strongly with Common Core standards, making it an ideal replacement.

The overhaul didn’t stop there, though. In fact, the Department of Education decided to appoint their own team of educators to review the standards and make recommendations due by July 1 of this year. These new standards will then drop the Common Core moniker and become one that belongs to the state itself as requested by the governor.

In Arkansas, it would seem that protests against the Core are not loud and boisterous like in other states. Instead, opponents have slowly but surely worked their way into positions of power and have been dismantling it from the inside. First to go was the assessment. Next is the Core itself. However, this hasn’t been bad because the changes have been easy to adapt to. With the Core in place now and only recommendations being made in the future, this upheaval has proven to be healthier for the state’s educational system.

Is Wisconsin confused on Common Core?

As an early adopter back in 2010, Wisconsin has proven to be one of the more volatile states dealing with Common Core. First a proponent then an opponent and now dedicated to it, it’s no wonder that the general populous is confused as to the state’s stance on the standards.


Governor Flip Flopping

The biggest trouble has been with Governor Scott Walker’s indecision. Claiming many times to be against the Core, many remain confused to his proclamation that he “effectively repealed” them in 2015 even though all statewide tests have been aligned to them. In truth, the schools have held on to these standards even though they are not forced by law to do so. However, the story gets a bit more interesting from there.

While schools don’t have to choose the Core, the new state exam was to be Smarter Balanced, a general exam aligned to Core standards. Therefore choosing any other standard set would only serve to ruin test scores and paint teachers in a bad light. So the Core remained. Then, Walker helped eliminate Smarter Balanced in favor of a shorter, cheaper option known as the Badger Exam. Even though it’s cheaper, it still remains aligned with Common Core, causing frustration among the educators of Wisconsin. They are disappointed that they can’t use this test to truly assess student progress with other states because while the Badger Exam might lead to higher test scores in the state, the results won’t accurately portray student learning on a national level.


Better Scores

All in all, 2015’s Badger Exam scores have shown interesting results with an average 51.2% proficiency in English and 43.7% proficiency in math. Like other states, the teachers were quick to warn parents and politicians not to take these scores too seriously as they are only the first results for a brand new exam. Unfortunately, though, this isn’t where the problem ends.

Highly criticized for a myriad of reasons, the released data has been anything be predictable. Some schools did incredibly well while others had low scores even though the students that tested were strong performers in advanced classes. Luckily, last year was the only year the Badger Exam would be used. Now unfunded, the state will once again take on a new statewide exam, the Wisconsin Forward Exam, it’s third assessment in three years.


As Wisconsin moves forward, its rift can only be understood as the result of a confused leadership. In the majority of states, officials have taken a firm stance, be it for or against the Core and its related tests. Wisconsin, however, is floating in a confused miasma of indecision that has resulted in wasted educational funds, wasted time and a frustrated educational system. As the teachers do what they can to navigate the governor’s inability to choose a side, it’s the children that are confused, adapting quickly and constantly to statewide tests.

Illinois Changes its attitude about Common Core

A weird amalgamation of liberalism in its city of Chicago and conservatism out in every other area, Illinois has taken the more liberal route in regards to education. Following the reveal of the Common Core, the state voted to adopt the standards on June 24, 2010. In addition, it became and has remained an active member of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for Colleges and Careers (PARCC), the group tasked with developing the new standardized test for the Core. That being said, the state is slowly becoming more two-sided in light of the PARCC test scores that released in 2015.


Growing Pains

Like most states, Illinois saw an extreme drop in readiness for college as determined by these test scores. Across every district, scores were low, prompting educators to send home letters of explanation so as to shield the children from any parental punishment. That being said, it’s the conservative districts that took the scores in stride, logically drawing the conclusion that a new test was bound to be lower since both teachers and students had never taken anything like it before.


Growing Resentment

While the non-Chicago areas are continuing to work to improve, it’s the big city that’s harboring a growing break between the Core and everyone else. From educators to parents, the PARCC test has been vilified as ruining the already struggling school system. Educators see it as an evil that is turning away both prospective and current teachers. Parents encouraged students to protest the exam, leading to certain schools reporting a 54% no-show rate. Unlike other states, educators are fully supportive of the parents doing this, even in light of Mayor Rahm Emmanuel shaming them for siding with the parents.

While it might seem like a great stand against a perceived evil, the fight to force the students to take the test is embroiled in a much more complex issue of funding and poor performing schools. In reality, it was only the higher performing schools with the wealthier parents that supported such a boycott of the PARCC. Such skip rates did not happen in the poorer districts. In addition, the state needs to maintain a 95% participation rate in order to continue to receive funding for these lower-performing and often underfunded schools – schools that have no bearing on the costly private institutes that are causing such a fuss.

In the end, the PARCC results have done nothing to prove or dismantle any theories so much as entrench individuals further in their current beliefs. Parents that believed the Core to be an evil now have found justification. Educators that knew lower test scores were coming are further convinced that this change is for the better, they just need more time. Though the Core will no doubt remain a staple of the state’s education system, what happens to the PARCC remains to be seen.

Iowa Shows Positive Progress on Common Core

After joining in the developmental process of establishing what the Common Core standards should be, Iowa had no qualms adopting them upon release in 2010. It was a move that has since proven to be an effective tool in helping the students of the state exceed their previous academic scores.


Federal Fears

Like virtually all other states, such success hasn’t saved Iowa from the vitriol of hate groups. Certain parents see the Common Core as a Federal takeover, allowing the government to come in and control a system that has traditionally always been controlled by the state. These anti-Core groups are also of the belief that the standards are aligned to the lowest levels of performance, making them extremely detrimental to the students in the state.

However, both of these claims are easily dismissed. Iowa, and many other states across the US, came together back in 2009 to develop these standards as a way of fostering a future set of students that would be able to compete scholastically on a global level both up until 12th grade and beyond. It was never something states have been forced to accept. In fact, there are number of states that never adopted the Core in the first place. Combine this with the fact that every school can teach the standards however they want and you have proof that the government is not trying to dominate state education and a set of standards that align to the highest ideals of achievement.


Going Forward

With the Core finally fully implemented for the 2014-15 school year, results are finally starting to come in. According to the 2015 National Report Card, Iowa has remained stationary, neither decreasing or increasing even with the Core being used. This has proven to be promising, though, as usually states undergo what’s known as an implementation dip – a decrease in performance during the early years of transitioning to a new program. In addition, though Iowa scores remained steady, these scores placed the state well above the national average, hinting at a promising future.

That being the case, it still hasn’t decreased frustrations felt by parents. Many have turned to social media outlets to complain about having a hard time helping their children with homework. Educators are quick to snap back that it’s because the Core uses methods not taught when the parents were in school and that if parents really want to help their children, they’ll teach the little ones how to adapt and succeed instead of throwing a tantrum when things become challenging.

All in all, Iowa has proven to be yet another state that has successfully brought in the Common Core with little to no major opposition. Because of this, teachers and students alike are beginning to reap the benefits of providing students with actual academic challenges.

Oregon’s Common Core Continues Movement

It’s been five years since Oregon adopted the Common Core standards and only this year took their first standardized test based on this new set of grade graduation requirements. As far as the state is concerned, though, it has given nothing but support and continues to provide this support as its teachers have adapted and pushed forward with this more rigorous set of learning standards.


Common Core Positivity

As a state not embroiled in Common Core fighting, Oregon news on the subject remains as unbiased as possible, doing its best to portray the adoption in a more positive light. When searching for news, Oregon is one of the few states to not have a “Parents Against Common Core” website populate one of the first results. It’s a shocking difference to anyone that has actually spent time reading about this issue.


State Exam Negativity

Though teachers and parents are accepting of the Core, it’s the state exams that have recently proven to be a problem. Known as PARCC, or the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, the standardized test has been created by representatives from each state to test students to the Core standards. Unfortunately, the implementation of this new test has led to some rather upsetting growing pains.

According to a survey released November 2015, many in Oregon’s teachers union are very concerned about this new test. Interestingly enough, though, it’s not about their students’ abilities to succeed. Instead, it’s more about the lost instructional time. One of the main examples used in this expression of concern revolved around “Raoul”, a Spanish-speaking student that had trouble reading but loved his wood shop class. Because of the testing, his time spent woodworking was severely decreased, so much so that during one testing phase, he simply clicked random answers to be done with the test while choking back tears.

However, this didn’t stop the testing from proceeding as planned. On top of the time sink, this year’s testing results have also shown just how many students aren’t at a college-ready level. In fact, only two-thirds of the state’s students read well enough for higher education while less than half have the math skills required. The state found that the usual low-income/high-income discrepancies are still there, with the economically struggling having the hardest time.

Not all hope is lost, though. In one school, teachers were able to virtually destroy this disparity, equipping over 80% of its lower income students with the education needed to achieve success in college. According to the teachers there, it’s all about showing the students how they can use what they’re learning in real life. If citations lead to a bigger allowance, kids will listen.

Common Core in Texas

We all know that it’s important for our children to be adequately educated so they can compete in the world job market once they’re adults. The Common Core Standards are a set of educational guidelines established by the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) along with the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center). These guidelines define the specific knowledge a student needs to acquire in order to graduate or be promoted to the next grade. Although it is completely voluntary, these universal standards have already been implemented in many states to ensure that students all over the country are on the same educational track and ready for employment or college once high school graduation comes around. While a number of states have already adopted the Common Core Standards, there are indeed some states that have decided not to follow these recommended educational guidelines. Along with Nebraska, Virginia and Alaska, the state of Texas also rejected the adoption of Common Core.


In May of 2013 the 83rd Texas Legislature passed House Bill 462, which prohibits any public school district in the state from adopting the Common Core Standards. The vote was overwhelmingly in favor of rejecting the standards with a total of 140 voting for the bill, 2 “Nays” and 2 non-votes. The new law later went into effect on September 1, 2013 and the decision not to adopt the Common Core Standards in Texas has left many of the state’s educators, parents and politicians at odds. This may be because there are many people who seem to be misinformed about the facts.


Some Texas legislators have expressed that they believe the standards are intentionally set low to accommodate students nationwide, while others don’t want Texas students to get left behind. There are also teacher organizations that have united to display their dissatisfaction with the possibility of having to teach according to standards set by the federal government and not locally. Contrary to what some may believe, the Common Core Standards are not a curriculum at all and they are not overseen or governed by the federal government. The implementation of these standards is actually left up to the governors who are supposed to work together with the CCSSO and NGA to ensure every student is provided with a quality education. The Common Core Standards also do not specify what and how a teacher teaches, as they are only a set of benchmarks and educational goals a child needs to reach each year.


There are quite a few reasons why so many Texan leaders, such as Governor Greg Abbott, do not want to implement the Common Core Standards in school districts throughout the state. The issue is still a hot topic that has been debated by many educators, school board members, politicians and parents. If you want to learn the truth about the Common Core Standards, it’s recommended you conduct your own research. With just a quick search, you’ll realize that there is plenty of factual information available online which is based on studies and statistics.